The distributed nature of aRMMs is a key challenge to implementation: it requires having a cohesive strategy and plan for implementing local RM activities. As was quickly pointed out, the effectiveness of RM programs is dependent on how well the programs are implemented at the local country level.
From evaluating effectiveness to tracking global implementation status, and rooting out non-compliance with SOPs at your favorite affiliate, collecting data has become a necessity for Tracking Systems.
Dan Feith of Orbit recently co-presented a webinar with Carla Perdun Barrett of PRA Health Sciences. The webinar recording is available here. The webinar abstract is described below. Over the last decade, pharmacovigilance professionals have witnessed a significant shift in risk management activities with regard to updated guidelines and regulations beyond North America and Europe.
It’s January, and that means we are gearing up for DIA’s Annual Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management Strategies Conference (PVRMS). We set aside time to review this year’s agenda, and we are looking forward to listening and learning as part of this growing community of drug safety professionals. If this is your first PVRMS conference, here
Over the years, a common question heard in consultations: “How do we track our distribution metrics for our aRMM’s?“ Many organizations continue to rely on metric tracking spreadsheets, with a row for each metric and a column for each time period (month, quarter, year, decade, century, and so on). Now we all know at Orbit,